This research integrity discussion activity explores the question of what to do about authorship if a collaborator passes away.

Commentary piece reflecting on the research integrity and human research ethics considerations for the research use of the data hacked from Ashley Maddison and posted online. Especially given individuals are identified and the access/use was without any consent.

An image that summarises the components of great review feedback.

Funny cartoon character about a review body behaviour that’s no joking matter.

A x2 five-minute research integrity discussion activity about collaborators and co-authorship.

This item provides notes, prompts and additional reading about a real human research ethics incident where anonymisation failed.

The objectives of this task are to ‘warm-up’ attendees and get them accustomed to talking with their neighbours about research integrity matters. This is also …

A sheet that describes a warm-up activity to put near the beginning of your human research ethics workshop.  This is appropriate for nearly all audiences.

Commentary sheet about the human research ethics standard published by Canada’s three Tri-Council (Canadian Institutes of Health Research | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Social Sciences | Humanities Research Council of Canada).

Commentary sheet about this research integrity statement that was one of the outcomes from the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity (2010). Despite the passage of time, it remains a useful reference for multi-jurisdictional research.