Access AHRECS Subscribers' Knowledge Base with Ease
The National Statement – NMRECRS#06
This sixth resource sheet for new members relates to the National Statement – a brief history, reading and use.
At the first meeting – NMRECRS#05
The fifth NMRECRS discusses useful approaches to your first meeting.
Human research ethics – NMRECRS#04
A resource sheet about human research ethics for the induction of new members of an HRE and as a refresher for continuing members
Preparing for your first meeting – NMRECRS#03
The third of six two-page resource sheet that could be provided to new members, as part of their induction, or to existing members as a refresher. The remaining three sheets will be published in the coming days.
The categories of membership and their responsibilities – NMRECRS#02
The second of six two-page resource sheet that could be provided to new members, as part of their induction, or to existing members as a refresher. The remaining four sheets will be published in the coming days.
The Meaning of Membership – NMRECRS#01
A two-page resource sheet that could be provided to new members, as part of their induction, or to existing members as a refresher. This is the first in a set of these resource sheets.
Quality in research ethics review – A Human Research Ethics resource
A PowerPoint with an engaging embedded audio by Colin Thomson AM about identifying and promoting quality in research ethics review.
Human bycatch – A Human Research Ethics commentary
Commentary on a real public-interest consideration that currently probably isn’t going anywhere near a research ethics committee. A useful discussion activity for Research Ethics Advisers, research ethics reviewers and researchers. This could also be a useful discussion topic within research offices.
s.,
Group recruitment – A Human Research Ethics discussion activity
This activity sheet encourages reflection on the interaction between principles, elements and provisions when thinking about group recruitment/consent.
Archived Posts
What constitutes “quality” in preclinical biological studies? – A research integrity commentary
Commentary by Nik Zeps on ‘Guest Post: Interesting Versus True? Measuring Transparency and Reproducibility of Biomedical Articles’, Scholarly Kitchen