Access AHRECS Subscribers' Knowledge Base with Ease
Implementing the Australian Code (2018) – A research integrity resource
A comprehensive resource (including 44 short audios spoken by Prof. Mark Israel) about the Australian Code (2018).
Human research ethics and privacy? You don’t need to be anxious
A cartoon image about needing to be apprehensive about privacy.
Solving a puzzle and end of year message (2018)
A cartoon image that was our well wishes at the end of 2018 and could be used in your professional development activities.
How does human research demonstrate beneficence? – A human research ethics discussion activity
Human research ethics discussion activity (ten minutes) relating to the ethical principle of beneficence and the National Statement (2007 updated 2018).
A rose thorn by any other name? – A Research Integrity Commentary
Commentary on why questionable publishers might be a more accurate term than predatory publishers.
How should respect be expressed in human research? – A human research ethics discussion activity
A 10-minute discussion activity about respect in human research.
National Statement, coercion and consent in clinical research – A human research commentary
Commentary item by Nik Zeps about coercion and clinical research.
(Australia) Avoiding coercion and inducement in clinical research – A human research ethics discussion activity
Human research ethics discussion activity relating to incentives in clinical research.
Illegitimate publishers (cheeky graphic)
Regardless of whether you call them questionable publishers, pay-to-play publishers or vanity publishers, we need to talk about them in our research integrity professional development efforts. While more entrenched in our thinking, the term predatory publishers no longer accurately reflects the dynamic of ‘shady’ research publishing. This cheeky graphic can be a lighthearted intro to this important topic.
Archived Posts
