Research Integrity
Impostor syndrome and HDR candidates – A Research Integrity commentary
Impostor syndrome and HDR candidates is no laughing matter… even if this cartoon is. HDR Supervisors and research institutions need to be mindful of and attend to the mental health of candidates. Their success is your success. A Research Integrity commentary.
It’s a slippery slope to research misconduct – A Research Integrity resource
This great print-ready infographic describes the small slips that can send you tumbling toward research misconduct.
It is an Australian modification of a resource produced by ORI.
A useful handout for a research integrity workshop. And a constructive addition to your Research Integrity Resource Library..
A recommended prompt for all researchers.
Duped – A Research Integrity commentary
When thinking about collaborative research, what resources and professional development does your institution provide to minimise the chances they will be duped?
Lost data – A Research Integrity discussion activity
Discussion activity about lost data.
Disaster recovery plan – A Research Integrity discussion activity
A simple and short discussion activity about the approach to disaster management plans for research
Sneak-peek at the new look for web – your input
We’re currently rebuilding the AHRECS web site. Here’s a sneak-peek at the new design. We’d love to get your input on what changes you’d like to see to our currentsite and what you don’t to change.
Authorship – A Research Integrity talk by Prof. Mark Israel
In this PowerPoint with embedded audio, AHRECS senior consultant Mark Israel delivers a 12-minute talk about authorship. This is a handy resource for HDRs and ECRs.
Archived Posts
Acting on ‘soft’ research misconduct – A Research Integrity commentary
In this commentary sheet we discuss what some have termed ‘soft misconduct’ and five ways in which institutions can deal with them. Others have reasonably observed that they are just research misconduct and should be investigated and punished as such. While this might indeed be the case, until national research integrity codes (such as the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research) list these behaviours as being research misconduct, institutions will need to deal with them with their own policies and procedures.