Human Research Ethics
Recruitment and risk – A Human Research Ethics discussion activity
Sometimes, recruitment strategies can be a source of risks to participants, perhaps they even know about the research. This discussion activity prompts workshop participants to reflect on the issues and their own research.
Principles of Māori & Indigenous research ethics (An annotated bibliography by Dr Lily George) – A Human Research Ethics resource
AHRECS has been engaged by a New Zealand university to work on a number of projects, including drafting a New Zealand equivalent to the popular …
Who watches the watchers? – A Human Research Ethics discussion activity
A discussion sheet about cameras and AI monitoring populations
Template HREC documents: Agenda – A Human Research Ethics resource
A template for a research ethics committee’s agenda. The first of our template documents for committees. Available to subscribers as a downloadable Word file.
Is my application ready for research ethics review? – A Human Research Ethics resource
This sheet is a resource to help an HDR Supervisor evaluate whether their candidate’s application for ethics approval is ready to be submitted for research ethics review.
Setting up a monitoring arrangement for human research
In this 11 minute talk, AHRECS senior consultant Kim Gifkins reflects on useful institutional approaches to the monitoring of human research.
A summary consent sheet – A Human Research Ethics discussion activity
Researchers like using summary consent material to complement voluminous information sheets, but is that a good thing? That and related matters are explored in this discussion activity.
eConsent – A Human Research Ethics talk by Nik Zeps
AHRECS consultant Nik Zeps gives an 11 minute talk about eConsent, its use advantages and future. A perfect in-meeting professional development activity for your research ethics committee.
An AI researcher? – A Human Research Ethics discussion activity
As AI that is used in research become smarter it raises some interesting questions
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Are they more impartial than humans?
- Should they or their programmers be listed as co-author or at least acknowledged?
-
-
-
-
-
-
This very topical discussion sheet could be used in the context of discussions about conflicts of interest, authorship and respect.
Archived Posts
Vulnerability, research ethics review and the review of s4 of the National Statement – A Human Research Ethics talk by Gary Allen and Mandy Downing
How we approach vulnerability can empower and respect individuals or compound their isolation and discrimination they face. In this 11 minute talk by Dr Gary Allen and spoken by Mandy Downing. This talk was sponsored by QUT as part of its HREC professional development and the Committe’s active engagement with the National Statement.