Good practiceInstitutional responsibilitiesResearch IntegrityResearch misconductResearcher responsibilities
Acting on ‘soft’ research misconduct – A Research Integrity commentary
In this commentary sheet we discuss what some have termed 'soft misconduct' and five ways in which institutions can deal with them. Others have reasonably observed that they are just research misconduct and should be investigated and punished as such. While this might indeed be the case, until national research integrity codes (such as the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research) list these behaviours as being research misconduct, institutions will need to deal with them with their own policies and procedures.
AHRECS Subscribers’ Area
Acting on ‘soft’ research misconduct – A Research Integrity commentary
Posted By : Gary Allen on July 11, 2022
Acting on ‘soft’ research misconduct – A Research Integrity commentary
This content is restricted to subscribers
Also see
How to avoid passive-aggressive mischief in a lab – A Research Integrity commentary
It’s a slippery slope to research misconduct – A Research Integrity resource
Authorship – A Research Integrity talk by Prof. Mark Israel
Public need and private pardon – A Research Integrity discussion activity
Archived Posts
Categories
SIGN UP FOR RESEARCH ETHICS MONTHLY NEWSLETTER