Access AHRECS Subscribers' Knowledge Base with Ease
Quality in research ethics review – A Human Research Ethics resource
A PowerPoint with an engaging embedded audio by Colin Thomson AM about identifying and promoting quality in research ethics review.
Human bycatch – A Human Research Ethics commentary
Commentary on a real public-interest consideration that currently probably isn’t going anywhere near a research ethics committee. A useful discussion activity for Research Ethics Advisers, research ethics reviewers and researchers. This could also be a useful discussion topic within research offices.
s.,
Group recruitment – A Human Research Ethics discussion activity
This activity sheet encourages reflection on the interaction between principles, elements and provisions when thinking about group recruitment/consent.
Flow to determine whether research on material published to the web/social media posts require research ethics review/consent? – A Human Research Ethics resource
Does online content analysis (including social media/web 2.0 posts) require research ethics review? Step by step flow and flow diagram.
Dracula attacks: Consent for wider use of blood – A Human Research Ethics discussion activity
A discussion activity based upon a fun cartoon image by Don Mayne. Dracula attacks, Consent for wider use?
Questionable publishers – A Research Integrity resource
A lot is said about questionable publishers or predatory publishers, but what are we talking about, have there been changes, and does the message need to be different depending upon the career stage of our audience?
Brainstorming – A Human Research Ethics discussion activity
A discussion activity about the ethical conduct of research with brain organoids. A potentially fun and topical way to get novices talking about human research ethics.
Obviously yours: Brain scans and implications of advances in technology and privacy – A Human Research Ethics discussion activity
Advances in scans and machine learning raise very familiar challenges. It’s time for careful reflection, not hysteria.
Design notes for proportional review forms (A Human Research Ethics resource)
Suggested structure and operation of a proportional review form. Part of a set of resources about proportional processes and resourcing reflective practice.
Archived Posts
What constitutes “quality” in preclinical biological studies? – A research integrity commentary
Commentary by Nik Zeps on ‘Guest Post: Interesting Versus True? Measuring Transparency and Reproducibility of Biomedical Articles’, Scholarly Kitchen