Access AHRECS Subscribers' Knowledge Base with Ease
Who passes along the message? – A Human Research Ethics discussion activity
This human research ethics activity sheet is based on another fun image by Don Mayne. Like much of Don’s work, while we are chuckling we find ourselves reflecting on an important topic (or, as in this case, topics). How is important and potentially sensitive information relayed to participants? How does an institution usefully inform the practice of researchers after research ethics review?
The National Statement – NMRECRS#06
This sixth resource sheet for new members relates to the National Statement – a brief history, reading and use.
At the first meeting – NMRECRS#05
The fifth NMRECRS discusses useful approaches to your first meeting.
Human research ethics – NMRECRS#04
A resource sheet about human research ethics for the induction of new members of an HRE and as a refresher for continuing members
Preparing for your first meeting – NMRECRS#03
The third of six two-page resource sheet that could be provided to new members, as part of their induction, or to existing members as a refresher. The remaining three sheets will be published in the coming days.
The categories of membership and their responsibilities – NMRECRS#02
The second of six two-page resource sheet that could be provided to new members, as part of their induction, or to existing members as a refresher. The remaining four sheets will be published in the coming days.
The Meaning of Membership – NMRECRS#01
A two-page resource sheet that could be provided to new members, as part of their induction, or to existing members as a refresher. This is the first in a set of these resource sheets.
Quality in research ethics review – A Human Research Ethics resource
A PowerPoint with an engaging embedded audio by Colin Thomson AM about identifying and promoting quality in research ethics review.
Human bycatch – A Human Research Ethics commentary
Commentary on a real public-interest consideration that currently probably isn’t going anywhere near a research ethics committee. A useful discussion activity for Research Ethics Advisers, research ethics reviewers and researchers. This could also be a useful discussion topic within research offices.
s.,
Archived Posts
What constitutes “quality” in preclinical biological studies? – A research integrity commentary
Commentary by Nik Zeps on ‘Guest Post: Interesting Versus True? Measuring Transparency and Reproducibility of Biomedical Articles’, Scholarly Kitchen